Human Rights of Children and Persons with Disabilities

 

Human rights provide advocates with a valuable framework to draw upon and an avenue of response to social injustice when national, state, and local laws and processes fail. CAFETY uses international human rights law to challenge the public to think beyond the rights domestic laws permit and analyzes public policy using this framework.


The United States, however, has not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol. These articles, in particular, are relevant to youth placed in residential facilities.
In 2009, Save the Children issued a groundbreaking publication to assist advocates better understand the two human rights conventions called: See Me, Hear Me: A guide to using the UN Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities to promote the rights of children. Additionally, the UN Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children was adopted by UN General Assembly (UNGA) on 20 November 2009. The Guidelines are intended to enhance the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and other relevant provisions of international and regional human rights law, in matters of protection and well-being of children who are in need of alternative care, or who are at risk of so being. It therefore focuses on two main aspects:

  • Ensure that children do not find themselves placed in alternative care unnecessarily; and
  • Where out-of-home care is provided, it is provided in appropriate conditions and of a type that responds to the child's rights, needs and best interests.

 

CAFETY calls on the United States Government to enforce the legally binding treaties it has already ratified. For instance, in 2010, Disability Rights International issued a report on the use of aversives at the Judge Rotenburg Center in MA.  The organization submitted their report to Manfred Nowak, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture. The Washington Post reports:

When "[a]sked if JRC's treatments constitute torture, Nowak responded, "Yes . . . I have no doubts about it. It is inflicted in a situation where the victim is powerless. And, I mean, a child in the restraint chair, being then subjected to electric shocks, how more powerless can you be?" Would the practices employed at JRC be allowed on a convicted terrorist? Nowak: "No, of course not."  "This is torture," he said. "Of course here they might say, But this is for a good purpose because it is for medical treatment. But even for a good purpose -- because the same is to get from a terrorist information about a future attack, is a good purpose. To get from a criminal a confession is a good purpose."


 

CAFETY calls on the US federal government to meet its obligations under international law of ensuring youth are not being subjected to torture or cruel and degrading treatment by taking affirmative action to ensure JRC and other programs using torture under the guise of treatment are held accountable.  CAFETY also calls on the US federal government to align its efforts with those protections afforded youth under the CRPD, prohibiting placement of youth in any institutions or institutional residential program and to regulate and monitor non-institutional residential programs to ensure no youth is being inappropriately placed or harmed in the name treatment.

 

Additionally, CAFETY understands the deinstitutionalization movement to be a global one. This is especially true as, increasingly, private institutions targeting struggling youth and families operate and exist outside of the purview of the state.  Nationals of one country may open and operate a facility in a different country and transport youth relatively freely - with little to no oversight and beyond the jurisdictional bounds of the country from which the child originates.  Our efforts, therefore, must also be global in scope. To that end, CAFETY builds upon existing organizations who have paved the way before us, such as Disabilities Rights International, partners with other local grassroots movements such as the Federation of Families for Childrens Mental Health, Campaign for the Ratification of the Covenant on the Rights of the Child or global efforts such as Women's World Summit Foundation, to help ensure that the rights of youth are most comprehensively protected.

 


UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ABBREVIATED)


Article 1
Right to Equality
Article 16
Right to Marriage and Family
Article 2
Freedom from Discrimination
Article 17
Right to Own Property
Article 3
Right to Life, Liberty, Personal Security
Article 18
Freedom of Belief and Religion
Article 4
Freedom from Slavery
Article 19
Freedom of Opinion and Information
Article 5
Freedom from Torture and Degrading Treatment
Article 20
Right of Peaceful Assembly and Association
Article 6
Right to Recognition as a Person before the Law
Article 21
Right to Participate in Govt and in Free Elections
Article 7
Right to Equality before the Law
Article 22
Right to Social Security
Article 8
Right to Remedy by Competent Tribunal
Article 23
Right to Desirable Work and to Join Trade Unions
Article 9
Freedom from Arbitrary Arrest and Exile
Article 24
Right to Rest and Leisure
Article 10
Right to Fair Public Opinion
Article 25
Right to Adequate Living Standard
Article 11
Right to be Considered Innocent until Proven Guilty
Article 26
Right to Education
Article 12
Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
Article 27
Right to Participate in the Cultural Life of Community
Article 13
Right to Free Movement
Article 28
Right to a Social Order that Articulates this Document
Article 14
Right to Asylum in other Countries from Persecution
Article 29
Community Duties Essential to Free and Full Development
Article 15
Right to a Nationality and the Freedom to Change It
Article 30
Freedom from State or Personal Interference in above Rights